March 31, 2011

The Humanitarian Empire May Strike Syria Next, Followed By Lebanon And Iran

There are many big lies that the U.S. President has to repeat to the American people, and the global public to maintain its legitimacy as the world's reigning superpower, and none bigger than the lie that the U.S. government is a force for good, freedom, and stability in the world, which was most recently repeated by President Obama in his speech on Libya:
For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security and as an advocate for human freedom. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world's many challenges.
Obama's Orwellian use of language is becoming so extreme that the only rational response is to laugh at him. There is no use in getting angry at what amounts to absurdity. Who actually believes that the U.S. government is naturally reluctant to use force? Since when?

Obama's approach to history is completely shallow. His idea is that you can use or misuse facts, or totally ignore them altogether, if it serves your overall political goals, and he's hoping that the American people will remain ignorant of their own history and their government's treason. It is obvious to even naive and clueless people that Obama is a fraud, who is not inhabiting the same political universe as the people he was elected to represent as President. He is operating on a different level of political consciousness, along with several other U.S. and global leaders who desire to bring into the world a new world government.

Under its current barbaric and manipulative rulers the U.S. government is not even hesitant to use force against the American people. The false flag September 11 attacks proved that nobody is safe from the crazy tyrants who are in charge of the White House, especially not the American people.

Since 9/11 it has been a stated policy of the U.S. government to destabilize the Middle East and stoke the fires of chaos and ethnic tension in order to fulfill its long-standing goal of regime change in various countries in the Middle East that wish to take an independent and nationalist path in the region. General Wesley Clark revealed the Bush White House's policy of regime change to Amy Goodman in March of 2007 on the show Democracy Now. Gen. Clark told Goodman that shortly after the 9/11 attacks he visited the Pentagon, where a general informed him of America's grand strategic vision for the Middle East, in which several countries would be attacked by the U.S. military. The list included Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. Iraq and Libya have been cleared off the board. Up next are Syria, Lebanon, and finally, Iran.

The Bush-era policy of regime change in the nations listed above is in full effect in the Obama era. Nothing has changed. New and bigger wars are still in the pipeline. What is happening to Libya right now is nothing compared to what will be done to Syria, Lebanon, and Iran by the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and maybe even the United Nations if it deems it "humanitarian" to force war on sovereign nations.

Last Sunday on Fox News, Sen. Joe Lieberman proposed the prospect of U.S. military action being used against Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad's regime. Lieberman said:
“If Assad does what Qadhafi was doing, which is to threaten to go house to house and kill anybody who’s not on his side, there’s a precedent now that the world community has set in Libya, and it’s the right one,” Lieberman said on “Fox News Sunday.” “We’re not going to stand by and allow this Assad to slaughter his people like his father did years ago.”

“Finally, we are on the side of the mass of people yearning to be free within the Arab world,” he added. (Courtesy of Politico)

Lieberman is an extreme voice, but he speaks for the U.S. and Israeli ruling elite, so what he says should not be ignored. Maybe liberals will join Lieberman and call for a UN-backed war on Syria, and Iran after that. Read Stephen Walt's article about the neocon-liberal alliance in foreign policy, and its implications for America's long-term future. Walt writes:
One reason that the Bush administration could stampede the country to war in Iraq was the apparent ease with which the United States had toppled the Taliban back in 2001. After a string of seeming successes dating back to the 1991 Gulf War, U.S. leaders and the American public had become convinced that the Pentagon had a magic formula for remaking whole countries without breaking a sweat. It took the debacle in Iraq and the Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan to remind us of the limits of military power, and it seems to have taken Obama less than two years on the job to forget that lesson. We may get reminded again in Libya, but if we don't, the neocon/liberal alliance will be emboldened and we'll be more likely to stumble into a quagmire somewhere else.
A successful war is the ultimate confidence booster. If Gaddafi is defeated fairly soon (by the end of the summer), the new world order faction and the neocon faction in the U.S. war establishment will probably feel so good about themselves that they will officially tie the knot before attacking the next country in the regime change line up: Syria. And Congress will most likely get shafted again because the new system doesn't require legislative approval or the people's informed consent.

"Obama thought it more important to lobby the Arab League than the U.S. Congress," writes Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman in his article "Obama's Unconstitutional War." It is a shameful truth that the tyrannical regimes of Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states are more important to the interests of the U.S. National Security State than the American people. America be damned, world government is the prize. All will be sacrificed: Freedom, Justice, Human Life.

When total global war finally comes, not only will the gates of hell be opened in the Middle East, but in America, Canada, and Europe as well. The U.S., Western, and Israeli ruling elites don't care what happens or where it happens because they are well positioned to profit from all the madness that they are helping to unleash on the world. Luckily for them, there are enough idiots in the world to defend their "humanitarian" wars, and even sacrifice their lives in the wars against the designated tyrants.

As long as there are gullible young men willing to join the military and mindlessly follow orders to fight criminal, and immoral wars then political and economic elites will exploit their naivety and ignorance of history to achieve their own political and economic goals. We have to reach the men in the military of every nation in NATO, educate them, and remind them to honor their oaths, as the organization Oath Keepers is heroically doing. Such a course of action may be our only hope for world peace, freedom, and global unity.

Ed Schultz = Big Head, Tiny Brain

What intervention in Libya tells us about the neocon-liberal alliance

What intervention in Libya tells us about the neocon-liberal alliance
By Stephen M. Walt
Published: March 21, 2011

Last Wednesday I spoke at an event at Hofstra University, on the subject of "Barack Obama's Foreign Policy." The other panelists were former DNC chair and 2004 presidential candidate Howard Dean and longtime Republican campaign guru Ed Rollins. The organizers at Hofstra were efficient and friendly, the audience asked good questions, and I thought both Dean and Rollins were gracious and insightful in their comments. All in all, it was a very successful session.

During the Q & A, I talked about the narrowness of foreign policy debate in Washington and the close political kinship between the liberal interventionists of the Democratic Party and the neoconservatives that dominate the GOP. At one point, I said that "liberal interventionists are just ‘kinder, gentler' neocons, and neocons are just liberal interventionists on steroids."

Continued. . .

Obama’s Unconstitutional War

Obama’s Unconstitutional War
By Bruce Ackerman
Published: March 24, 2011

In taking the country into a war with Libya, Barack Obama's administration is breaking new ground in its construction of an imperial presidency -- an executive who increasingly acts independently of Congress at home and abroad. Obtaining a U.N. Security Council resolution has legitimated U.S. bombing raids under international law. But the U.N. Charter is not a substitute for the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress, not the president, the power "to declare war."

Continued. . .

March 30, 2011

The Congress is Obsolete Under The New World Order System

There are probably many reasons why President Barack Obama didn't bother to seek the approval of Congress before committing the U.S. military to an undefined mission in Libya, some of them may even be legitimate and reasonable, but none are more important and more alarming than the fact that the Congress is obsolete under the new world order system.

Ten years ago it was easy for someone to deny that such a system was being put into place in America and other Western nations by stealth and without debate, but not anymore. Unless you want to purposely appear foolish and ignorant you can not deny that there is a scripted plan for a dictatorial world government. Even CNN is using the term "new world order" in its coverage of the Libyan war. It doesn't make sense to say that the new world order is emerging anymore, because it is already here.

For decades the tyrants behind the new world order moved in slow motion and masked their undemocratic political program behind euphemisms such as "global governance," but they are no longer in the shadows. In fact, most of them are proud. They firmly believe they are accomplishing a task that can only be fully appreciated generations from now. That is the nature of treason. Every traitor is also a comrade, and depending on your perspective, a revolutionary.

But are these new world order conspirators right in their judgment of themselves as heroes of a future age? Absolutely not. Nobody took Bush Jr. and the neocons seriously when they said that the invasion of Iraq will be justified in the eyes of history, and that they will be recognized as liberators. Everybody views them as crazy radicals who should have been impeached.

How long will the American people, and the peoples of other Western nations tolerate the tyrannical new world order system is a question that cannot be answered at this moment. We are still in the early stages of an evolving global political crisis that will rock America above all other nations.

Sooner or later, President Obama is going to have to make a speech justifying the new world order system, and the destruction of the U.S. constitution. The unmasking will be painful for a lot of people, and most likely cause popular uproar, but it has to be done because the President and the governments of the West can no longer politically hide the fact that Congress and Parliament are obsolete national institutions. The Libya case illustrates this fact. Internationalism is the new norm, at least for now. And it looks like many people are fine with global dictatorship, especially self-described democrats and liberals.

Of course, Obama can continue to lie about his administration's hidden agenda, but people are believing him less and less. A salesman can lie and get away with it only for so long. His presidency can be saved if his handlers have the guts to stage another terrorist attack in America and blame it on foreign agents, but even that course of action may not rescue Obama's dropping poll numbers because false-flag terrorism has been exposed and it is seen for what it is: government deception and state terrorism.

Ultimately, the tyrants who want to impose a dictatorial world government will fail, just like Hitler did, as well as every other criminal conqueror in the past who desired to rule the known world. Despite being socially conditioned and brainwashed, the people of America and the West are not going quietly into the good night. And a few good men in the Congress and Senate are not either. Millions of people still believe in the U.S. constitution and don't regard it as a "piece of paper" like Bush and Obama do.

Last week, Senator Jim Webb criticized President Obama for bypassing Congress on Libya, saying:
“[A] concern that I have is that we have been sort of on autopilot for almost 10 years from now in terms of presidential authority in conducting these type of military operations absent the meaningful participation of the Congress,” Webb said. “We have not had a debate and I know that there was some justification put into place because of concern for civilian casualties. But this isn’t the way that our system is supposed to work.” (Courtesy of The Daily Caller)
Congressman Ron Paul voiced the same concern in this video about the war in Libya.

It is inevitable that a coalition of patriots across nations will rise and oppose the new world order system on grounds that it is tyrannical and illegitimate. And they will probably succeed in the end because it is the most difficult thing in the world to establish and preserve authority which is seen as illegal and untrustworthy by the people.

Also, it does not help the globalist cause that the new world order system was planned in secrecy by a collection of the most corrupt, dishonorable, and murderous criminals around. Add the fact that its existence was guarded by the media for decades, and what you have is a political crisis of the highest order. Congress might as well step aside and let the American people take back their country. The same goes for Canada, England, and other countries in the West.

It may turn out to be a good thing that our parliaments are so dysfunctional, stupid, and corrupt.

Poetry by Carl Sandburg - Good Morning America

Poetry by Carl Sandburg - Good Morning America (Courtesy of Four Seasons Productions).

March 28, 2011

New York Magazine Attacks Alex Jones

First it was Rolling Stone, and now New York Magazine has joined the media attack on Alex Jones and the 9/11 truth movement. Which media dinosaur is next? Esquire? Vanity Fair? Time? Don't these idiots realize that attacking 9/11 truth, and Alex Jones, who is a truth-telling hero of our age, is not a good marketing move? Forget their conscience, they should try saving their business first. And telling the truth is good business. Nothing else explains Alex's huge success and popularity than his dedication to truth-telling. If he was just another loud-mouthed idiot instead of a patriot and a truth-teller, he would be a Republican parrot on Fox News or trading pills with Rush Limbaugh.

Joe Hagan, the author of the New York Magazine's hit piece on Alex, says that Alex is a pimp of "political paranoia." That's the Establishment's codeword for "truth speech." Truth speech is forbidden in mainstream news and commentary. If you state plainly that the Bush administration was behind 9/11, you're automatically classified as paranoid. If you believe big banks on Wall Street robbed America, you're a conspiracy theorist. If you believe the Earth revolves around the Sun, you're insane and should check into rehab.

But treating the truth as heretical and viewing history through the eyes of official dogma is out of fashion nowadays. Pretty soon the hipsters will be carrying 9/11 Truth signs. Times have changed. The Establishment media is losing ratings, viewership, trust, everything. The Western public is beginning to recover its sanity. People are in the process of discovering that their rights were taken away from their governments while they were asleep.

Recovering consciousness always takes a bit of help, and Alex Jones has done more than most to help wake the people up and take back their freedom. The around-the-clock media attack on him, the 9/11 truth movement, and the patriot movement is having little effect. Still, we should not be reserved in our condemnation of journalists like Joe Hagan and media publications like the New York Magazine who print anti-truth trash and belittle truth-tellers as being "paranoid" crazies.

Like it or not, an attack on Alex Jones is an attack on all of us who are fighting for justice, sanity, truth, and freedom. This is a media and information war for the truth, freedom, and the destiny of our world, and just like any other war, we must defend those who are on the front lines engaging the enemy day after day. We can not let Alex's character be assassinated and his hard-won reputation degraded and ruined by establishment media hacks. The fight to save freedom, punish the traitors who did 9/11, and end the illegal war on terror will undoubtedly involve Alex's provocative and groundbreaking radio show. His radio broadcast is a light of truth in a dark media age.

Anybody who attacks the truth is by nature an enemy of freedom, democracy, and justice. Since the truth was the first casualty in the war on terror, it must be recovered and restored to health before all else. We can't end the criminal wars in the Middle East without first exposing the big 9/11 lie. Alex Jones has been on a mission to save the truth and preserve public memory about 9/11 sine day one. He deserves our vocal support now more than ever as he is being attacked from all sides.

We have good reason to defend Alex against his critics. While he was busy speaking the truth and attacking the root of tyranny for the past decade, Establishment journalists repeated the official government line on 9/11 and Iraq to the public, and cowardly turned their backs on truth, freedom, justice, and humanity.

The media's silence about the obvious treasonous truth that 9/11 was done by individuals in the highest levels of the U.S. government will never be forgotten. There will be a backlash. Public anger and public derision are what's called for--righteous rage. People have not even begun to express their hate and anger at the establishment media for betraying democratic principles, covering up the lies about 9/11, and poisoning the public mind with dangerous government myths.

I have not totally given up on professional journalists to tell the truth about 9/11. Redemption for journalists is possible. They can regain their reputations and save their profession if they have the guts to go after the traitors and war criminals in Washington, Tel Aviv, and London.

Suppressing the truth and looking the other way no longer works. And tainting the reputations of heroic figures like Alex Jones and Ron Paul who tell the truth about the Federal Reserve Bank and the American empire isn't working either. Every time they are attacked their popularity increases.

The game is up. The People are winning the information war. Nobody believes the establishment media's hit pieces on Alex Jones and the 9/11 truth movement. The establishment media is digging its own grave. The truth about 9/11, the real reasons for the war on terror, and the private Federal Reserve can't be ignored or discredited any longer. And there is no going back now. War crimes tribunals and treason trials are next. The world must get to the bottom of what happened on 9/11 so that we can end the apocalyptic wars in the Middle East.

Certain "journalists" can also be charged with war crimes and treason along with government officials and other conspirators behind 9/11 if it is found that they knowingly lied to the world about the nature of the 9/11 attacks and the illegal war on terror. I'm sure there is more than enough rope lying around to accommodate all the traitors and war criminals, and all the guests of the house of Satan.

March 27, 2011

Katastrophic Treason: The Truth About 9/11 And The Plot To Destroy America

Definition of Catastrophe (
  1. the culminating event of a drama, esp. of a tragedy, by which the plot is resolved; denouement
  2. a disastrous end, bringing overthrow or ruin
  3. any great and sudden calamity, disaster, or misfortune
  4. a total or ignominious failure
  5. Geol. a sudden, violent change, such as an earthquake
From Greek katastrophē, an overthrowing, katastrephein, to overturn.
When historians mark the day when America's constitutional republic was hijacked from within and manipulated to violate the American people's best interests they won't point to September 11, 2001. The American republic was overthrown long before Bush Jr. stole the White House in 2000. The government-orchestrated 9/11 attacks merely marked a new stage that is part of a longer bipartisan plot to overthrow America's system of government and bring it under a new world order with a whole new system of checks and balances in which the people and U.S. constitution play no part whatsoever.

Despite all kinds of evidence, people are quick to deny that high treason is happening in America. A lot of people, including educated professionals, never leave la la land, and continue believing government myths and the hijacked government's official history of events like the JFK assassination, the MLK assassination, and 9/11.

In any country and in any era it is important how we view history because our perception of the past is critical to understanding the motives and aims of our leaders and institutions, and what historical direction their policies are taking us.

Overthrowing a nation requires first and foremost the rewriting of its history, and the traitors and tyrants who stole America from the American people know this truth very well. They made sure to cover up big events and acts of national sabotage like the murder of John F. Kennedy in 1963, the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964, the sinking of the USS Liberty in 1967, and the false flag 9/11 attacks in 2001. The mainstream media and all the agencies of the U.S. federal government are all complicit in these acts of treason and war crimes.

The miseducation of America has been a long process. But America's situation is not unique. History has ample examples of how tyrants, once they get into power either by force or fraud, immediately rewrite history so as to favor them. They also take great measures to keep the people dumb, fearful, and ignorant. Despotism and ignorance go together. In a country with a history of free speech and liberty like America even greater measures are required to keep the people in a state of ignorance. Washington's tyrants depend on secrecy, mass propaganda, and fear of foreign threats for their survival as the nation's gatekeepers. As George Bailey writes, "In the National Security State secrecy is the foundation of the security."

In the last couple of decades the tyrants in Washington have dedicated themselves to accomplishing greater goals by joining hands with tyrants of other lands to set up a global dictatorial government ruled by private banks and multinational corporations.

Transferring political power from democratic nation states to an authoritarian global government is a difficult and transformative political, global, and historical change, and could never have been attempted without the knowledge and support of the highest leaders in the U.S. government. Future historians will make sure to mark this fact. They won't be surprised to find that the elitist plotters who want to bring this change about worked in the highest levels of the U.S. political, academic, and media establishment, including the last four Presidents: George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.

What historians will find surprising instead is that so many people, including intellectuals and thoughtful people, were in a state of denial for so long in the face of irrefutable proof that their government was taken over in the most serious manner by traitors and political outlaws who held no regard for public opinion or human life. They may also be surprised that in the land of the free rose the biggest tyrants in all of human history.

Future historians will have to recover history which has been manipulated and rewritten by the political and finaical giants of today. These new historians will not shy away from the truth that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by members of his own government, and build on the work done by numerous scholars and researchers in the field such as Professor Peter Dale Scott, author and peace activist James W. Douglass, and many other trailblazers. They'll also connect JFK's murder with the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy by the same corrupt forces in the U.S. establishment, and look to attorney William Pepper who has done groundbreaking research in this area.

A new generation of historians will notice that history itself was hijacked by the secret American state, and that public myths were created by government experts like Philip D. Zelikow for political purposes and hidden political agendas. These historians will work hard to reclaim history, and rescue truths that have been buried under the rubble of official government history.

The culture will have to undergo a process of reimagining history, and this is where documentarians and screenwriters in Hollywood can provide the greatest assistance to humankind. Film directors like Oliver Stone are already laboring to recover America's real history and preserve the essential truths of our time. Millions of people have already begun the process of reimagining history by no longer believing the official story of 9/11 and JFK, and questioning the reasons for the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 which illegally transferred the American people's right to create money to a group of global private banks that were not loyal to the nation. Future historians won't gloss over this fact and minimize it as just a little anecdote in American history. They'll remind readers that one of the biggest reasons why the American founding fathers raised the sword against the British empire was because they hated the Bank of England which abused and exploited the colonists.

A new catchy catchphrase or term will have to be used to describe the present age. Author James W. Douglass has already provided a very good one: The Age of the Unspeakable. He uses the word unspeakable to refer to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The majority of the American people still cannot imagine that such a criminal and heinous act was committed by people within their own government, because that would clearly indicate that their government doesn't work for them. Such knowledge is way too scary for a lot of people; they would rather stay blind and powerless than relearn recent American history.

Accepting the truth about the death of JFK and 9/11 means acknowledging the fact that traitors run the United States government. People naturally don't want to admit that this is the case because they would be forced to retake their government from their poisonous and immoral leaders by means other than an election. Everybody knows that traitors and tyrants are not taken out by voting, but in a more drastic and dramatic fashion. Tyrants and traitors deserve a spectacular ending to their reign of terror and deceit, and voting the bastards out just doesn't cut it.

Maybe the biggest reason why people deny the truth about 9/11 and JFK is that the truth is so catastrophic. It is stomach-turning truth. The word "katastrophē" in Greek means "an overthrowing" i.e. a catastrophic event that overthrows the old order. Acts of treason like the murder of JFK and 9/11 are acts of catastrophe. Treason breeds terror inside an individual. People become disillusioned when they find out they have been betrayed on such a grand scale. It is sickening, and psychologically painful to admit that high-level traitors control the U.S. government who think nothing about killing innocent Americans, and assassinating courageous American leaders like JFK, MLK and RFK who spoke for the common good of America.

Since treason is such a large part of the current and recent history of America, I think the term "Katastrophic Treason" defines the present age pretty good. Why Katastrophic Treason? Because America's old political order was overturned completely by anti-democratic traitors and tyrants. The death of JFK was part of a greater historical overturning of the U.S. constitution that began much earlier in the century, and it's important to realize that his death marked a big change in American and world history. Mr. Douglass lays out the reasons why in his incredible book on JFK. Buy his book and read it patiently, if you have not already done so.

9/11 is another significant event that marked a big change in the evolution of America and the world. Such a gigantic fraud revealed to a whole new generation that America's current government is built on treason, lies, and mass murder. What is needed now is a historic and global revolution fueled by righteous anger and peaceful non-compliance. The chances for success are greater than we realize at the moment. Tyrants by nature are weak and vulnerable to public opinion.

Although it is difficult to win back freedom, restore popular consent, punish the traitors and criminals, and return the governments in America and other Western countries back to the people, it is not impossible. Destroying popular government myths and recovering history is a good start. "History," wrote Cicero, "is the witness of the times, the torch of truth, the life of memory, the teacher of life, the messenger of antiquity."

March 26, 2011

Philip D. Zelikow: The Big Head Behind The Big Lie About 9/11

Part I - Philip D. Zelikow: The Myth Maker Behind 9/11 And The War on Terror

If the mainstream press in America and the West wasn't treasonous, stupid, corrupt, cowardly, and immature, we would be hearing about Philip D. Zelikow, not Charlie Sheen or Gaddafi or Michael Jackson or whomever is talking and acting crazy on any given day. Zelikow is a more important person, and also more crazy, than celebrities. But most people have never heard of his name, and that's not by accident. He was appointed as Executive Director of the 9/11 commission by the Bush administration after Henry Kissinger resigned because of public pressure, especially from 9/11 family members.

In his role, Zelikow made sure that the official conspiracy theory about how and why the 9/11 attacks happened would not be criticized or questioned by members of the Commission and the public, and remain the official history of 9/11. Philip Shenon, investigative reporter and author of the book "The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation," said that "The appointment of Zelikow to head the inquiry into America’s response to the September 11 terrorist attacks was akin to putting the fox in charge of the hen house," (This quote appears on several websites on the net; I came across it in a comment made by Robert Rice on this blog post on

Philip D. Zelikow is a fascinating character. He is the Joseph Goebbels of our age, the propaganda minister for America's corrupt and treasonous shadow government. I have nothing against him personally. Don't get me wrong, I think he should be hanged and buried because he is a traitor and war criminal, but he's not the biggest criminal in Washington by any stretch of the imagination. Zelikow is just an ambitious individual who is serving a corrupt and irremediable system, much like Condoleezza Rice, Karl Rove, and Lee Atwater before him (Chairman of the RNC, Campaign Manager for George H.W. Bush's election campaign). These people are obviously smart, and brilliant, but they're also shameless and soulless. They don't have a conscience or feel moral empathy for others. And you can say that about a lot of human beings but what makes individuals like Zelikow and Rove different is that they have their fingertips on the pulse of the world, and they want to serve power and tyranny. They weren't born into the royalty of power, but they entered the court because of their political skills, talent, imagination, and knowledge of the human psyche, history, and politics. They don't owe their success to political lineage and privilege, but sheer will and the ability to lie about anything at any given moment.

It's hard not to be fascinated by Zelikow who can lie so easily, especially about murder, and state crimes. Watch this interview Zelikow did with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now about Philip Shenon's book on the 9/11 Commission. The guy is self-righteous, arrogant, defensive about his reputation and background, and gets his points across, regardless of the questions being asked. You can tell how much he hates answering probing questions about his work on the Commission and his connections with Karl Rove. And he smiles nervously a lot during the interview, probably masking the hatred and annoyance that he is feeling inside. A lot of people who lie for a living like George Bush and Barack Obama also smile way too much. Politicians and government officials who lie want to present a nice face to the public. They force their face to smile because they recognize the fact that smiling disarms people and makes them believe liars more.

Smile while you lie is the motto for the U.S/Western political establishment. Real and natural human beings only smile spontaneously. Liars like Zelikow, Rove, Bush, and Obama like to put on airs because they believe they're superior than the rest of humanity. They can lie at will to the public about big events like 9/11 because they don't care what the people think. The People might as well not be there, they might as well be dead. These leaders live in their own universe, and the common people are not a part of it, so they could care less about the well-being and freedom of the American people, the Iraqi people, or the Afghan people.

Zelikow's understanding of historical change and turning points in civilization doesn't include the role of The People. Watch this lecture that he gave at the American Historical Association in Washington in January, 2008 about turning points in history. People can call him crazy, but the fact is that most of what he says is true. The mass of humanity buys lies at will just as the tyrants of humanity sell lies at will. The success of the big lie about 9/11 was expected by the government conspirators who committed the attacks and covered it up. They knew their history, and they knew that the common people are dumb and fearful fools.

But are the common people dumb and cowards all the time? No. At certain points in history, people stop being sheep, and hang their rulers. We are reaching such a point. My advice for Zelikow, Bush, Obama and the other liars and traitors is run for the hills now because The People are awake and angry. The Age of Treason is over. The Era of Big Lies is done. Humanity is entering a new age. And war criminals are not welcome.

The New Building 7 Ad

Iraq Veterans Against The War: The War is Over

March 25, 2011

Philip D. Zelikow: The Myth Maker Behind 9/11 And The War on Terror

Authoritarian regimes could not exist without official historians, government gatekeepers, and political myth-makers whose job is to construct and control the public's beliefs about their government's actions, and make people view history through the eyes of tyrants and believe the narrative of power. America's authoritarian regime relies on what can be called a modern priest class who tell lies for the state for a living and have considerable influence on how people understand significant world events in American history like a major war or a terrorist attack on the scale of 9/11. One of the high-priest members of America's class of official historians is Philip D. Zelikow, an academic and author who served as the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission.

Zelikow's main area of expertise is in the field of public policy, particularly in the framing of history to serve state policy and the formation of public myths, or "public presumptions." From Wikipedia:
While at Harvard, he worked with Ernest May and Richard Neustadt on the use, and misuse, of history in policymaking. They observed, as Zelikow noted in his own words, that "contemporary" history is "defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public's presumptions about its immediate past. The idea of 'public presumption'," he explained, "is akin to William McNeill's notion of 'public myth' but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word 'myth.' Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community."
Zelikow says that history's narrative power can affect how people engage with the world and how they relate to "the actions of individuals in the history." As far as Zelikow and the National Security Regime in America are concerned, it is better that the American people view 9/11 as an attack by a radical Muslim terrorist group than to know the truth - that 9/11 was the result of a government conspiracy at the highest levels of the Bush administration, the United States government, and the Israeli government.

Zelikow combined his knowledge of public mythology with his knowledge of the so-called threat of terrorism. In 1998, Zelikow co-authored a report with Ashton B. Carter and John M. Deutch called "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy," which argued that America's national security was at greater risk after the fall of the Soviet Union than before, and laid out a strategy of deterrence and preventive defense. They wrote: "We are not as confident that the United States government is suitably prepared to address the new threat of catastrophic terrorism that utilizes weapons of mass destruction or intensive cyber-assault." A new world brought with it new enemies to America, the report stated. America's conventional military had to be remodeled to meet the new threat of catastrophic terrorism, which threatens public security on the largest and most unconventional of battlefields - society. But they left out an essential truth about terrorism in the report, and that is that the American empire is the biggest agent and sponsor of terrorism in the world. Only a terrorist state can be threatened with terrorism.

In retrospect, the "Catastrophic Terrorism" report was less a warning than a blueprint. The authors pondered the implications of a terrorist attack in America, saying that such an event would mark a "before" and an "after" and give the government greater powers to protect the citizenry from similar attacks. Zelikow, Carter, and Deutch wrote:
Readers should imagine the possibilities for themselves, because the most serious constraint on current policy is lack of imagination. An act of catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic bomb test, or perhaps even worse. Constitutional liberties would be challenged as the United States sought to protect itself from further attacks by pressing against allowable limits in surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and the use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either as other terrorists seek to imitate this great "success" or as the United States strikes out at those considered responsible. Like Pearl Harbor, such an event would divide our past and future into a "before" and "after." The effort and resources we devote to averting or containing this threat now, in the "before" period, will seem woeful, even pathetic, when compared to what will happen "after." Our leaders will be judged negligent for not addressing catastrophic terrorism more urgently.

Using imagination, we hope now to find some of the political will that we know would be there later, "after," because this nation prefers prevention to funereal reconstruction. When this threat becomes clear the President must be in a position to activate extraordinary capabilities.
The government conspirators who committed 9/11 attacks most likely read this report, and Zelikow himself must have been pleased when he was selected to be the Director of the 9/11 commission.

The job of Zelikow and other like-minded opportunists is to cover up treasonous and criminal events and whitewash history. He was chosen to be the Director of 9/11 Commission by the Bush administration because of his Machiavellian abilities to preserve official myths, and formulate rationales for criminal state policies and procedures.

Another interesting bit of information is that Zelikow had close ties with the first Bush administration as well as with a key member of the second Bush administration, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The two published a book in 1997 called "Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft." Zelikow has also co-authored a book with World Bank President Robert Zoellick on America and East Asia, and ironically, he edited a book called "Why People Don't Trust Government."

You don't need a book to answer the question of why people don't trust government, all it takes is four words: because the government lies. And it also outsources its lying to individuals like Zelikow. To borrow a phrase from English essayist William Hazlitt, Zelikow is an intellectual pimp of power. Washington's treasonous National Security Regime pays academic whores like Zelikow to give their lies and crimes a rationale, and justify the murder of innocents. Such people regard the separation between politics and morality as a natural thing. Killing innocent human beings to serve a greater agenda is an essential part of "statecraft." So is covering up history and replacing historical truths with political myths.

In March 2000 Zelikow wrote a review of the book "Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor," by author and WWII veteran Robert Stinnett. The book successfully makes the case that the FDR administration had foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, discrediting the official story that was used to draw America into World War II. Zelikow defended the official lie in his review, a pattern that can be seen throughout his career. His main purpose is to suppress real history and maintain the elitist narrative of politics and world events in the modern world, from WWII to the war against Communism to the 9/11 attacks and the war on terrorism.

Five years ago, the writer of Washington's Blog stated that "Zelikow is arguably the single most responsible person in covering up the truth about 9/11." From Washington's Blog article called "The Myth Maker":
We all know that he controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the Commission's inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this article and this article). Zelikow is arguably the single most responsible person in covering up the truth about 9/11.
In 2004, author and former CIA and State Department analyst Melvin Goodman told Democracy Now's Amy Goodman that Zelikow was paid by the CIA to whitewash the Agency's history, and that he has served as a mouthpiece for numerous administrations. Democracy Now, April 29, 2004:
AMY GOODMAN: Why did they roll over, and what is the role of Phillip Zelikow, the director of the 9-11 commission? We have reported in the past that he is the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. So, they clearly are colleagues and are close.

Well, he has ties to the first George Bush administration from 1989 to 1992. He has a very close working relationship, professional relationship with Condi Rice. He headed a case study project at Harvard and took hundreds of thousands of dollars from the CIA. He used CIA documentation and produced case studies that exonerated the CIA from any charges of politicization of intelligence, particularly with regard to the Soviet Union. He has generally been an administration voice in all of the matters that he has dealt with, whether they are Democratic or Republican administrations.
The proof of that Zelikow is guilty of covering up the 9/11 attacks, and manipulating the American people is inescapable. He is one of the most corrupt members of Washington's powerful and secretive establishment, a traitor of humanity, and a war criminal.

The official myth about 9/11 has so far determined the course of human history, and transformed America into a despotic country, while the victims' truth has been denigrated and treated as a crazy conspiracy theory by the official press, and large segments of society. But the myth won't prevail forever. The criminal war on terrorism won't last a century. Truth cannot be suppressed. History cannot be erased. Freedom cannot be crushed to pieces. If kings can be guillotined, then so can presidents.

Zelikow and the rest of the traitors who committed 9/11 and covered it up won't get away with their crimes. Judgment day is coming to Washington D.C.

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice

Center for 9/11 Justice - PRNewswire-USNewswire:

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

Continued. . .

THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776 - 3rd place

March 24, 2011

Unofficial Obama Speaks The Truth

Below is a piece of fiction, a rough draft of what I think President Barack Obama might say if he was ever given a truth serum or forced by a U.S. court or an International Criminal Court to tell the truth to the American people and the world about who he is, whose agenda he really serves, and why his administration covered up the treasonous 9/11 attacks and carried on the most tyrannical policies of the Bush administration.

Unofficial Obama Addresses His Prosecutors, And Defends Himself:

Let me begin by saying that I am not who I presented myself to be to the American people and the world. But I am not a traitor of mankind, which is one of the charges. I am a traitor of America, yes, that I accept, but for a very good reason: America is obsolete, the Constitution is a piece of paper, and the American people are too wasteful of the planet's precious resources. A global government is what we need. We live on a finite and globalized planet in which old national identities and boundaries mean little. The nation-state is a done deal. The technological contract has replaced the social contract. In this reality, it is natural and good to act against your country to save your planet. My motivations and ideals were not transparent, true, but they were always just and good.

I covered up 9/11 because it was the necessary and prudent thing to do as President of the world's largest empire. Chaos would reign if I had listened to the crazy people who were crying for a new investigation. Also, the 9/11 events were useful and served our agenda. And my administration continued the economic, and political policies of previous administrations because first, they were good and I agreed with many of them, and second, the course of human events had long ago pointed in a general direction towards a world government and a new world order. Such a development was natural, and I had to continue America on this course. The goal of a one world government had to be achieved by any means necessary, even the sacrifice of American lives.

People wonder how I rose to become the first black President of the United States of America. The answer is I had nothing to do with it. Everything was given to me: the media attention, the presidency, the crowds, the peace prize, none of which I deserved, but I received them because I was a better salesman than Hillary Clinton and John McCain and the big boys recognized that fact early on and poured money into my campaign. I owe everything to my masters and handlers. Even my name was given to me. My original name is Barry Soetoro.

All I own is a suit and tie. Like most presidents before me, I wasn't much of a leader. I was put into office by the elite to carry out the agenda for world government, and I was happy to do it. I was content that I didn't have any influence on major policy or that I didn't control domestic and world events in my position as the elected President of the United States. I was nothing more than the most overpaid clerk in Washington. My main job was to make sure that every special interest group with public opinion on its side, every corporation with money to spend, every bank with influence in government, and every politically powerful organization was satisfied and taken care of, even at the expense of the safety and well-being of the country and the people. What matters is power, not the people.

I betrayed America and the American people. I'll admit that much and more. And it's true I was not the leader of the free world, but the biggest slave of all. But you don't hear any shame or regret in my voice because I am proud of what I was secretly a part of as President. I am a conscious slave of power, and am happy that my will was of service to the agenda for world government because I have nothing but contempt for freedom, and the people. What is freedom good for? What are the people good for? They are stupid and don't know what's good for them. Is it my fault that they consistently pick the most lying, and arrogant politicians to lead them and tell them what to think? They are their own worst enemies.

They say that I knowingly duped the people, that they gave me their trust and attention and all I gave in return were empty words. But that is a half-truth. What is often forgotten is that the minds of my followers were empty to being with, so all they deserved were empty words and empty promises. I ask you, is that not a fair exchange? Emptiness for emptiness: I call that a natural transaction between tyrants and slaves. Nothing is more fair in nature than that. I flattered the crowd because the crowd likes to be flattered. I deceived the people because they wanted to be deceived. They fell for me because they don't want to rise up to the level of citizens and take on the challenge of change and governing for themselves. They took the easy road of fixing their country's problems, they thought I could change everything in a blink of an eye so they placed all their responsibilities and duties as citizens on me, they thought I was superman, they believed everything I said without double-checking the facts or going over my record in the Senate or my past history, and they did all this because they wanted to remain slaves and have leaders to look up to. I simply gave them what they wanted. Don't blame me for giving the people what they asked for.

Society needs managers and technocrats to run things. We serve the people better than they serve themselves. We know what is good for mankind. We can take the people to places they could not go if they were left to themselves. People can't expand evolutionary horizons and push the species forward, only those in power can attempt such a grand destiny for man and succeed.

The people are clueless about their destiny. But I know my destiny, and it is with the strong and the powerful. What do the people know? They know nothing about the past or the future, about science or history. They are a burden on the planet. We the autocrats and the agents of the autocrats don't recognize the people's will because they don't have any will to speak of. Any time their sad little will creeps up into the course of history tyrants crush it at first sight and get rid of their wishes without any struggle because the people's will is weak. They are flies to be swatted away, not to be taken seriously. Only the will of power is strong enough to save humanity, and save the planet we live on.

Whatever you do, you can't put me down. You can't put the whole conspiracy on trial because it's been in motion for decades. It's too late. Sacrifice me, hang me, but change can not be reversed. World government is inevitable. It is already here. Change is inevitable. America was destined to collapse like all empires and wither away.

Those of us who serve power will find a way sooner or later to put the people in a state of universal sleep, and you know what? They will thank us for it because they are weak-willed creatures who can't stay up through the night. They wish to go to sleep, and stay asleep for good, and I'm here to sing them lullabies so they can get their wish.

I am happy to be a slave of power because power is my friend, and the people are my enemy. Freedom I hate, and treason I love. Mephistopheles I know, and myself, not. That is the way it is, and always will be.

So, go ahead, call me a traitor, a deceitful puppet, and a petty tyrant for helping to establish a new world government on top of America, but I'm not the only one. And your children will thank us later. They will see me and others behind this conspiracy as visionaries and leaders of the planet.

Robert Ownby - “Crazy Like Alex Jones” Music Video

Impeach President Obama

March 23, 2011

Truthout Interview With Retired Air Force Capt. Michael Kearns

God bless Retired Air Force Capt. Michael Kearns for coming forward.

EXCLUSIVE: CIA Psychologist's Notes Reveal True Purpose Behind Bush's Torture Program
By Jason Leopold and Jeffrey Kaye
Published: March 22, 2011

Dr. Bruce Jessen's handwritten notes describe some of the torture techniques that were used to "exploit" "war on terror" detainees in custody of the CIA and Department of Defense.

Bush administration officials have long asserted that the torture techniques used on "war on terror" detainees were utilized as a last resort in an effort to gain actionable intelligence to thwart pending terrorist attacks against the United States and its interests abroad.

But the handwritten notes obtained exclusively by Truthout drafted two decades ago by Dr. John Bruce Jessen, the psychologist who was under contract to the CIA and credited as being one of the architects of the government's top-secret torture program, tell a dramatically different story about the reasons detainees were brutalized and it was not just about obtaining intelligence. Rather, as Jessen's notes explain, torture was used to "exploit" detainees, that is, to break them down physically and mentally, in order to get them to "collaborate" with government authorities. Jessen's notes emphasize how a "detainer" uses the stresses of detention to produce the appearance of compliance in a prisoner.

Continued. . .

The Manufacturing of Terrorism: 9 Ways The U.S. And Israel Create Conflict and Chaos

I. Demythologizing Terrorism

Terrorism is a tricky word. First of all, it is a political categorization. Aggressive regimes like the ones in America, Israel, and Iran all have political enemies that will never go away as long as these regimes continue their aggressive and unjust actions towards them. Instead of resolving conflicts with their enemies and becoming friends, such regimes choose the more destructive path: war. And the first stage in war is to demonize your enemy, and that's where the word "terrorist" comes in. It is a useful word to use if you're a state murderer and a tyrant, but it is stupid for citizens to view life and world events through this narrow prism because such thinking ensures that conflicts will never be resolved.

Anybody who gets called a terrorist, whether they are Palestinians, Irish, or any other group, is automatically turned into a moral villain, pushed to the edge of the conflict, and their grievances are forgotten. Those of us who are interested in peace and building bridges know how counter-productive and illogical it is to cast an entire group of people as terrorists. People who fight, resist, and die have motivations for what they do, and most of the time those motivations are entirely justified. If you're living under occupation what would you do? Submit to the conqueror and give up, or die with honor by defending your land and family? If you're not a coward you will fight, regardless of the circumstances. You will do whatever it takes to gain freedom, and you will be in the right.

So terrorism as we've been brainwashed to know it by the mainstream media and Western governments does not exist. The people of Iraq who are fighting against the occupiers are not terrorists, they are resistance fighters. Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization, it is a resistance army. I don't agree with their politics or extreme religious views, but I'm not going to lie and call them something they are not.

Edward Peck, a retired U.S. diplomat who served as the deputy director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism in the Reagan Administration, said on the show Democracy Now in July 2006 that the definition of terrorism is not black and white, and that the terrorist "is in the eye of the beholder." Peck:
In 1985, when I was the Deputy Director of the Reagan White House Task Force on Terrorism, they asked us—this is a Cabinet Task Force on Terrorism; I was the Deputy Director of the working group—they asked us to come up with a definition of terrorism that could be used throughout the government. We produced about six, and each and every case, they were rejected, because careful reading would indicate that our own country had been involved in some of those activities.

After the task force concluded its work, Congress got into it, and you can google into U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2331, and read the U.S. definition of terrorism. And one of them in here says—one of the terms, "international terrorism," means "activities that," I quote, "appear to be intended to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping."

Yes, well, certainly, you can think of a number of countries that have been involved in such activities. Ours is one of them. Israel is another. And so, the terrorist, of course, is in the eye of the beholder. And I think it’s useful for people who discuss that phrase to remember that Israel was founded by terrorist organizations and terrorist leaders, Menachem Begin, who became statesmen and went on to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
To go to war against an undefinable enemy like "terrorism," is an absurdity. It is a fact that the global war on terrorism is a cruel hoax. Counter-Terrorism is a fraud, despite what the governments of Israel, America, and other governments tell the people. G8 leaders can make statements on Counter-Terrorism every year, it won't change anything until members of the G8 stop occupying countries, funding terrorist groups, and radicalizing people by oppressing them.

The American philosopher Robert Anton Wilson noted the hypocrisy of countries like America and England demonizing the people they oppress and tyrannize over as terrorists."Terrorism," said Wilson, "means we could disarm them to the extent that the only way they can fight back is by blowing themselves up in the process. Oh, how horrible they must be to do something so stupid. Well, when you conquered people, and you've taken their land away, and you're mistreating them every way you can think of, and taken away all the weapons they can possibly use, of course they're going to use whatever is left, and you can call them terrorists. They called the IRA terrorists, too. My god, England terrorized the world for seven centuries or more and they dare call somebody else a terrorist? The United States has been bombing the world and blasting it all through my lifetime, and they dare say anybody who strikes back is a terrorist?" (From Robert Anton Wilson's CD called TSOG [Tsarist Occupation Government]).

The biggest terrorists in the world are the states of U.S. and Israel--or rather, their shadow states which are undemocratically managed by oligarchs who view the people as sheep and war as a good thing. The main objective of these two states is to conquer - by war or deception. America's military is being used to conquer the Middle East in order to consolidate wealth and power for a tiny group of private banks and fascist corporations who control the American government, and Israel is conquering its neighbours instead of living in peace with them because it is an expansionist and racist state. Israel can change its aggressive policies and live in peace, but not until the leaders of Israel stop deceiving the Israeli people and instilling fear in them.

People are viewed as sheep by elites because people are sheep, at least for most of the time. Mankind is a herd species. All the advancements in society throughout history have been made by visionary leaders and outcasts, not by the majority of men. History is full of examples of how the majority of men are misled, and deceived about the most basic state policy: the destiny of their country. Sheep have but one destiny, and everywhere it is the same: slavery and death.

Sheep are sacrificed when they are slaughtered, men are honored when they die. The individuals who were killed on September 11 by the shadow states of America and Israel were sacrificed to launch a new global war, justify the destruction of Western freedoms, and give Israel a free reign to do whatever it wants to the Palestinian people.

II. Power Terrorizes The Powerless: The Conqueror vs. The Victim/Resister

Let me be clear. Terrorism is real, but it is state terrorism that should worry us the most. State terror creates conflict and chaos in society, and some people respond with violence. But to lay the blame on the oppressed for political violence is morally repugnant. The authoritarian tricksters in political power in America, Israel, and the West are to blame. We are being terrorized by our own illegitimate and criminal governments in the West, not anybody else.

Global domination by illegitimate international private banks and multinational corporations who control Western governments is a real and persistent threat to the interests and freedoms America and other Western nations, as opposed to global Islamic domination which is a manufactured threat that is used to take away civil liberties, justify aggressive wars in the Middle East, and excuse Israel's unjust actions towards the Palestinian people as "counter-terrorism."

Only Israel faces Islamic resistance from some groups and nations in the Middle East and that's not because these people are anti-Semitic or they flatly refuse to recognize the state of Israel, although that is a part of it, but due to the fact that the racist leaders of Israel have had a mentality of conquest and war since the inception of Israel in 1948 instead of a mentality of cooperation and coexistence. Of course, the leaders of Israel never publicly state their aim, but after six decades it has become obvious. Those who can't see that the Israel-Palestinian peace process has been consistently manipulated and undermined by the lying leaders of Israel have either not been paying attention, or they are willfully blind.

Israel's present political aims are unreachable because history shows that whenever a state aims to conquer a land and put a group of people under its will by force or fraud, that state will be met with forceful and continual resistance. To refer to such resistance as "terrorism" is a political tactic that does not reflect reality and history but rather the interests of the state which does not want to abandon its strategy of conquest. In Israel's case, it has done almost everything under the sun to conquer the Palestinian people and the land that they live on, such as crippling their will through psychological warfare and social conditioning, conducting massacres, destroying their infrastructure and homes, imprisoning their whole society with walls and surveillance, denying them dignity and human rights, and casting them as terrorists to the world when they fight back. In other words, using the word terrorism in a social policy and security context is meaningless, because the conqueror, who has the power to do real harm, is the biggest terrorist of all.

The conqueror has the power to create new public myths for his own benefit, to mold minds and shape his thoughts and beliefs, to invent new histories, to use language to paint his victim as a barbarian and a beast, to prohibit him from resisting, to dumb him down and put him in a corner, and to use any weapon necessary to finish him off, all the while defending his actions as necessary, and even holy.

The conqueror knows that the best way to disarm your victim is by calling him the aggressor, the terrorist, the murderer. This is what the state of Israel has been doing to the Palestinian people since World War II, and what America's shadow terrorist state has been doing to the world in that same period.

It is hard to believe, but, nonetheless, it is true that in the last century America's constitutional republic was silently conquered from within, through propaganda, deception, and political assassinations, by a traitorous global ruling oligarchy made up of global financiers who own the Federal Reserve Bank, criminal multinational corporations, and their functionaries which include bought-off politicians, corrupt academic experts, and members of the press, the intellectual pimps of power as the English essayist William Hazlitt called them.

"Power," wrote Hazlitt in his essay Toad-Eaters and Tyrants, "is one and indivisible; it it self-centered, self-willed, incorrigible, inaccessible to temptation or entreaty; interest is on its side, passion is on its side, prejudice is on its side, the name of religion is on its side; the qualms conscience it is not subject to, for it is iron-nerved; humanity it is proof against, for it sets itself up above humanity; reason it does not hearken to, except that reason which panders to its will and flatters its pride. It pursues its steady way, its undeviating everlasting course, 'unslacked of motion', like that foul Indian idol, the Jaggernaut, and crushes poor upstart poets, patriots and philosophers (the beings of an hour) and the successive never-ending generations of fools and knaves, beneath its feet; and mankind bow their willing necks to the yoke, and eagerly consign their children and their children's children to be torn in pieces by its scythe, or trampled to death by the gay, gaudy, painted, blood-stained wheels of the grim idol of power!" (William Hazlitt, The Fight and Other Writings; pg. 356-357).

III. The Manufacturing of Terrorism: 9 Ways The American and Israeli Shadow States Create Conflict and Chaos

If there was such thing as a terrorism factory the CIA would be the closest thing to it. The low-level grunts don't have a clue about who they are working for, they think they are serving and defending America but in reality their missions and orders come from a hijacked government and treasonous leaders whose aim is the complete destruction of America and the establishment of a new global dictatorial government. The self-inflicted 9/11 attacks accelerated the destruction of America, but the process towards global government began much earlier.

People who deny the validity of the scientific and common sense facts that show 9/11 to be an inside job resort to established dogma to explain their belief. One of the complaints that is repeatedly made by 9/11 truth deniers is that 9/11 truth activists don't name names and put faces to the crime, but that is not true. Here is a list of individuals who were definitely involved in the planning, execution, and cover-up of the 9/11 attacks: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Mossad Operations Chief Mike Harari, and American academic, diplomat, and executive director of the 9/11 Commission Philip D. Zelikow. More names can be added, but you get the idea. There are names and faces that can be connected to the 9/11 crime and cover-up, just like any other state crime in history.

I don't know the complete truth about what happened on 9/11, there are no shortcuts or back alleys to the truth, because such knowledge indicates that I know the residence of truth. I don't know where the house of truth about 9/11 is, but I know the neighbourhood it is located in, and the names of the landlords. I also know this: it takes conscious effort to reject the popular myth that is heaped upon us by our governments and the Western mainstream media as the one and only truth about how and why 9/11 happened.

So many people respond automatically to the claim that 9/11 was an inside job, disbelieving it without registering the facts first and taking in all the contradictions about the official story. It's like they have become zombies, mentally defenseless and psychologically retarded. "It is the rigid dogma that destroys truth," said the English philosopher Alfred North Whitehead, "and, please notice, my emphasis is not on the dogma but on the rigidity. When men say of any question, 'This is all there is to be known or said of the subject; investigation ends there,' that is death. (From 'Dialogues of Alfred North Whitehead as Recorded by Lucien Price; pg. 168).

Understanding the truth about terrorism and the 9/11 attacks is a slow and painful psychological process. Very few of us can fit all the pieces together, and I'm not one of them. Hopefully I can explain to the best of my ability how the "counter-terrorism" fraud works and illustrate the methods and techniques that are used by the secret governments of America, Israel, England and other nations to psychologically condition the people of America, Israel, and the West and create the impression that there is an unresolvable cultural and political conflict between Islam and the West.

1. False Flag Attacks: This is the most obvious and most well understood technique so I won't go into any detail. The basic definition of false flag terror is "governments attacking people and then blaming others in order to create animosity towards those blamed," (quote from Washington's Blog). This Washington's Blog article has over ten examples of government officials around the world admitting that they use false-flag terror, including Israeli agents, the former boss of Italian counterintelligence, and the former Indonesian president. I wrote an article back in November called "When Will U.S. Leaders Confess To The American People That America Carries Out False-Flag Attacks As Part of Its Foreign Policy?" that has more information on false-flag terror.

2. FBI Sting Operations: Governments don't always commit terrorist attacks, most of the time they outsource it to others, usually stupid people and useful idiots who they pay, train, and even coerce into placing a bomb at a designated location. For more about how and why this tactic is used, read Glenn Greenwald's November 2010 article called "The FBI successfully thwarts its own Terrorist plot,"

3. Release Video Tape Confessions of Intelligence Operatives Posing as Terrorists Screaming Against America: The most famous example of this is the Mossadagent Adam Yahiye Gadahn a.k.a. Adam Pearlman posing as a member of Al-Qaeda. Here are two good articles that explain this cynical technique, "Adam Gadahn: Domesticating the Fake al-Qaeda Threat" by Kurt Nimmo, and "Double Agent Gadahn Threatens Bush In Neo-Con Stunt," by Paul Joseph Watson. Another example is CIA officials creating fake Osama Bin Laden video messages. The article to read on that is called "Former CIA Officials Admit to Faking Bin Laden Video" by Steven Watson.

4. Stage Fake Terror Incidents: This method is meant to build up tension in society, demonize a group or nation by blaming them for the incident, and keep people under stress and in fear, without giving them a release. A government can at least respond to a full-blown terrorist attack, whether staged or not, by issuing threats and increasing the level of political rhetoric, and people can experience the emotions of grief and hatred, but it is much more puzzling to respond psychologically and politically to a terrorist misfire. There are many examples of these types of incidents such as the Christmas Day "Underwear" Bombing. In that case, a government patsy from Nigeria was given a fake bomb and boarded onto a plane with the help of an intelligence official. Check out this interview of Kurt Haskell on the Alex Jones Show for more information about this case. Haskell was on the same plane and saw that the government patsy was assisted onto the plane by a man who appeared to be a intelligence official, either from Mossad or the CIA.

5. Bomb and Occupy Countries, and Torture Innocent People: This is probably the most obvious way to create chaos and needless conflict in a region of the world. America has enemies in the Middle East because it has disrespected Muslim people, bombed their nations for immoral reasons, overthrown democratic governments, and tortured people young and old. These are the actions of states who want chaos and blood, not peace and order.

6. Spread Paranoia and Fear: Fear is a tyrant's favorite weapon to use against his people because it works so well. The tyrants of America have been using this weapon against the American people for the last sixty years and more. First it was directed against Communism and now it is directed against Terrorism. The intent is make people feel insecure and make them run to the government for protection. The Department of Homeland Security spreads fear in America by creating video messages that portray helplessness and chaos in society and advices people that they can help by spying on their neighbours and reporting suspicious activity to the government. Such fear-based communication by the government targets the emotional side of human beings rather than their intellectual and rational side.

7. Media Propaganda: William Hazlitt said that since the French Revolution "the press has been the great enemy of freedom, the whole weight of that immense engine (for the purposes of good or ill) having a fatal bias given to it by the two main springs of fear and favour." In the last century the press was used to rile up nationalism and national prejudices in order for people to support their government's wars against other nations; wars which were entirely fruitless and demonic. The same trend has continued into this century. It has been pointed out again and again that the media was used to brainwash the American public about the threat of non-existent WMDs, and terrorism. If it wasn't for the mainstream press, hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq and Afghanistan wouldn't be dead, and millions wouldn't be homeless. I view the establishment media as even more traitorous, cowardly, and corrupt than the government leaders who are part of our shadow governments in the West. Silence is consent. Spreading poisonous government propaganda, and giving aid to government traitors and state terrorists is an unforgivable crime against humanity.

8. Support and Arm Ethnic and Political Groups: This is a classic realpolitik way of how governments destabilize other governments, and create human suffering and turmoil in the process. Governments train, arm, and fund ethnic and political groups in countries that they want to destabilize, conquer, and eventually control. The governments of America, Israel, and Iran are all guilty of this behavior. The result is conflict, and war. And in the end the minority ethnic and political groups get betrayed by the governments who originally supported them. One example of this is America's support for Kurdish rebels in Northern Iraq at the start of the Persian Gulf War, and then stabbing them in the back once the war was over. Currently, Israel and America are training and supporting Kurdish armies in Iran and Iraq and may use them against the regime in Tehran once World War Three officially begins. Of course, the Kurds will be betrayed again by the American government but on a much larger scale this time around.

9. Create A Public Myth: The art of lying and creating public myths has been mastered by powerful states and powerful conquerors. All great religions that aim to conquer and attract converts rely on popular and historical myths, especially Islam and Christianity. Point blank: the victors call the shots in any conflict, and that means they get to invent history. One of the chief architects of the 9/11 myth is the guy who served as the director on the 9/11 Commission which was established to investigate the origins of the attacks: Author and former U.S. diplomat Philip Zelikow. Independent journalist Mike Whitney has wrote about Zelikow's myth-making ways in his articles, "Information Warfare, Psy-ops and the Power of Myth," and "Stealing the Midterms and the Power of Myth."

Here is an excerpt from his article "Information Warfare, Psy-ops and the Power of Myth":
The Pentagon’s bold new approach to psychological operations (psy-ops) appears to have derived from the theories of former State Dept official, Philip Zelikow (who also served on the 9-11 Commission) Zelikow is an expert on “the creation and maintenance of ‘public myths’ or ‘public presumptions’. His theory analyzes how consciousness is shaped by “searing events” which take on “transcendent importance” and, therefore, move the public in the direction chosen by the policymakers.
Myths are generated by conquerors, and the most powerful conquerors in the world today are the private banksters and criminal multinational corporations who hijacked the U.S. government, created the CIA, and assassinated one of America's greatest presidents because he wanted to liberate America and the world from war and fear. Whitney writes more about Zelikow's cynical view of history and the public mind in his article, "Stealing the Midterms and the Power of Myth":
Isn’t that the same as saying there is neither history nor truth; that what is really important is the manipulation of epochal events so they serve the interests of society’s managers? Thus, it follows that if the government can create their own “galvanizing events”, then they can write history any way they choose.

If that’s the case, then perhaps the entire war on terror is cut from whole cloth; a garish public relations maneuver devoid of meaning.
The belief that governments have the power to create public myths reflects Zelikow's anti-democratic beliefs about the role of the people in society. Karl Rove expressed the same belief when he said that America is an empire that can invent new realities simply because it can. Kings and tyrants thought this way. Hitler thought this way. And we know what happened to them.

IV. The Bigger The Lie, The Easier The Sell

Hitler and the Nazis didn't invent mass lying, and mass propaganda, and discover the magic of telling a big lie. Throughout history governors have lied to the people they were elected to serve on a grand scale. Israel's leaders and the American empire picked up where the Nazis left off, and have repeatedly told big lies since World War II. The American empire told a big lie about the attack on Pearl Harbor in order to force the American people to support America's entrance into WWII, and a generation later another big lie was told about the Gulf of Tonkin incident which led to the Vietnam war. Israel's leaders have used the same trick, and consistently lied about Israel's role in instigating Israeli-Arab conflict and starting wars.

The "Big Lie" is considered ancient wisdom by tyrants and statesmen of powerful empires and nations. William Hazlitt wrote in his essay "Toad-Eaters and Tyrants" that "the greater the lie, the more enthusiastically it is believed and greedily swallowed."

"Power is the grim idol that the world adore;" wrote Hazlitt, "that arms itself with destruction, and reigns by terror in the coward heart of man; that dazzles the senses, haunts the imagination, confounds the understanding, and tames the will, by the vastness of its pretensions, and the very hopelessness of resistance to them. Nay more, the more mischievous and extensive the tyranny - the longer it has lasted, and the longer it is likely to last - the stronger is the hold it takes of the minds of its victims, the devotion to it increasing with the dread. It does not satisfy the enormity of the appetite for servility, till it has slain the mind of a nation, and becomes like the evil principle of the universe, from which there is no escape. So in some countries, the most destructive animals are held sacred, despair and terror completely overpowering reason." (William Hazlitt, The Fight and Other Writings; pg. 359).

The political theorist Hannah Arendt echoed Hazlitt over a century later, applying "the evil principle of the universe" to modern totalitarian states, and especially to the Nazis. She wrote in her book The Origins of Totalitarianism:
There are numerous reports by survivors. The more authentic they are, the less they attempt to communicate things that evade human understanding and human experience--sufferings, that is, that transform men into "uncomplaining animals." None of these reports inspires those passions of outrage and sympathy through which men have always been mobilized for justice. On the contrary, anyone speaking or writing about concentration camps is still regarded as suspect; and if the speaker has resolutely returned to the world of the living, he himself is often assailed by doubts with regard to his own truthfulness, as though he had mistaken a nightmare for reality.

This doubt of people concerning themselves and the reality of their own experience only reveals what the Nazis have always known: that men determined to commit crimes will find it expedient to organize them on the vastest, most improbable scale. Not only because this renders all punishments provided by the legal system inadequate and absurd; but because the very immensity of the crimes guarantees that the murderers who proclaim their innocence with all manner of lies will be more readily believed than the victims who tell the truth. The Nazis did not even consider it necessary to keep this discovery to themselves. Hitler circulated millions of copies of his book in which he stated that to be successful, a lie must be enormous--which did not prevent people from believing him as, similarly, the Nazis' proclamations, repeated ad nauseam, that the Jews would be exterminated like bedbugs (i.e., with poison gas), prevented anybody from not believing them. (The Portable Hannah Arendt; pg. 120).
The lie about the 9/11 crime is another example that showcases the principle for all who are willing to see with eyes open that "the very immensity of the crimes guarantees that the murderers who proclaim their innocence with all manner of lies will be more readily believed than the victims who tell the truth." Most people are overwhelmed by the evil American empire, and the evil Israeli government, and would rather go down in history as the faithful slaves of these governments rather than resist them and change their governors. They think that people who tell the truth about 9/11 live in a parallel universe. But the truth is that the leaders and policymakers in America and Israel are the ones who live in a parallel universe. They are the real crazies. The traitors and war criminals in America have not only hijacked the government, but they have hijacked history itself. Come Judgment Day, they must be hanged for their treason against humanity.